Published May 31, 2023, 6:21 p.m. by Bethany
Over the last few days, we have been inundated with debate over the Housing Fund, we have discussed its Pros and Cons, is it a tax or a saving? Who gets a house? Who doesn’t? Don’t get me wrong, it is important, but let us not lose sight of many other provisions in the bill that deserve our attention.
I will sample a few, and my list is by no means exhaustive.
For a start, the Bill proposes to charge 16% VAT on insurance compensation. So basically, this is the money that is paid to one after injury or loss or damages. Insurance compensation basically aims to restore one to their original state, following loss or damage. It is not a profit-making exercise. So basically, you get hit by a bus and you will have to pay taxes on your compensation.
You may also like to read about:
[Music]
over the last few days we have been
inundated with debate over the housing
fund we have discussed its pros and cons
is it a tax or a saving who gets a house
who doesn't
get me wrong it's important
but let us not lose sight of many other
Provisions in the bill
that deserve our attention
I will sample a few and my list is by no
means exhaustive for a start the bill
proposes to charge 16 percent VAT on
insurance compensation
so basically this is the money that is
paid to one after injury or loss or
damages
Insurance compensation basically aims to
restore one to their original state
following loss or damage
it is not a profit making exercise
so basically you get hit by a bus and
you will have to pay taxes on your
compensation
further there is a proposal to charge 20
excise duty on mobile and internet data
in a country that is touted as going
digital and encouraging the use of
online spaces don't forget this is the
same government that says they have
digitized over 5 000 government services
you see you apply for a passport online
your driver's license your certificate
of Good Conduct amongst many others this
will no doubt widen the digital divide
further the cost of mobile phones
themselves could increase due to
increase in tax on imported phones now
one would argue that this will help
local producers
the problem though is we really don't
have that many local Alternatives how
many companies actually make mobile
phones locally
Kenyans still rely heavily on imported
gadgets this will make gadgets
unaffordable for many even at a time by
the way when we're expecting Farmers to
get extension services via their phones
in addition that bill also aims to
charge 12 percent on mobile money
transfers
and then of course there is a proposal
to increase the vat on fuel products
from 8 to 16 percent this will have a
ripple effect on the cost of just about
everything else in the country
now the finance bill 2023 wants to amend
the income tax act with respect to turn
of attacks
now this tax was controversial even when
it was first introduced in the previous
administration as it seeks to charge
taxes on turnover rather than profit
but back to present day this amendment
proposes to Target a greater number of
smaller businesses you see initially it
targeted businesses with a turnover of
between 1 million and 50 million
Shillings
but now it has moved that bracket to
Target those making between just half a
million Shillings and 15 million
Shillings every year
now this just means that many more
smaller businesses would be subject to
this three percent tax now remember this
is at a time when focus is largely on
the SME sector that is touted as the one
that will drive economic growth
particularly as we recover from the
global covid-19 pandemic
now if you're a farmer listen up because
the price of fertilizer could go up if
this bill is passed
this is because the proposal is to
reclassify fertilizers from zero rating
to exempt vat supplies what this
basically means is that it is the
manufacturers who will bear the cost
meaning they could decide to pass on
that cost to you
the farmer when you go to buy the
fertilizer
business owners are also worried lot
when it comes to how they will handle
disputes with a tax collector KRA you
see the bill is proposing that anyone
who has a dispute with the Kenya Revenue
Agency and challenges them before the
tribunal will have first have to pay 20
percent of the amount under dispute
before they can even file the appeal
but that this amount would be refunded
if the Challenger wins the suit against
Kerry now business owners are saying
this is too high an amount to pay before
the disputes even heard or decided in
fact one wonders why anyone has to pay
any amount at all
now sometimes these disputes take a long
time as you know to be decided you know
in a court process and that means that
once money is held up for quite some
time while the murder is being hired and
determined
furthermore that proposal goes against a
Court ruling on the very same issue in
which deputy chief justice Philemon said
there should be no such preconditions
before a dispute is heard and determined
she said and I quote it is unreasonable
as it impedes the appellant's access to
Justice by imposing a condition
precedent before a matter can be heard
contrary to articles 48 50 and 159 of
the Constitution of Kenya end quote
so ladies and gentlemen if you're a
farmer or a content creator who will now
have to pay 15 percent of taxes on your
earnings if you're a consumer who uses
public transport drives a car
a salaried Kenyan who will have to pay
more in the housing fund consumer of
goods and services
pay attention to the contents of the
bill
as one popular show host in this country
says
there is something for everyone
that's my take tonight
2CUTURL
Created in 2013, 2CUTURL has been on the forefront of entertainment and breaking news. Our editorial staff delivers high quality articles, video, documentary and live along with multi-platform content.
© 2CUTURL. All Rights Reserved.